The paradox of absolute happiness
One "flamboyant celebrity" said she just wants to be happy. Is it really that hard to be happy when you have little or no resource issues?
Often happiness is hindered by value judgments: they will think the wrong thing, they will judge, they will not understand, they will sarcasm at any convenient moment. The difference in age, social, material status... Is this factor really decisive?
Let's assume that there is no interest in the opinion of others, then what... Then we ourselves find difficulties and problems, if not externally, then within ourselves: thin lips, cellulite on the butt, small biceps or fat belly. Is this the stop factor to absolute happiness?
The most paradoxical thing to conclude is that happiness is almost absolutely dependent on someone else. Only a +1 person can be happy, receiving that intangible part of what is so lacking for this very absolute happiness. A voice, a smell, a touch... just the mere understanding that you are not alone, that there is someone who will listen and pity you for no particular reason.
The need for happiness is not always, not all the time, but it is very sharp and deep... to the point of trembling and dizziness. Everyone needs his own drug man. But it's harder to get such a "drug" than traditional ones. That's why we get dogs when we want loyalty and obedience. Cats - when we want tenderness, warmth and affection.
Are you perfectly happy?
EN 
RU 
ES 
IT 
DE 
FR
Because happiness, it's a stretch 🙂 🙂 .
Why is happiness necessarily connected with the presence of a "drug addict"? Is it impossible to experience this feeling regardless of whether you are alone or with someone?
Of course, it's always nice to share that feeling of happiness with someone you care about. The key word is "share/share")
Apparently happiness, as well as the concept of love, do not exist for me a priori.