Man and compromise: weakness or strength?

Compromise - good or bad for a man? To give in = to show weakness? Somewhere... Ah, I remembered... Poperechny was talking about compromise - something that both agreed on and that both of them are not happy with. Cool!! 😆

If you say that a man is becoming shallow, looking for this certain "real", then why the hell should he compromise? A real man's decision is clearly weighed, supported by experience, intelligence and... in extreme cases - force.

But what about “pleasing your lady”? After all, a real man is a bit of a henpecked husband... right? 🙂 A strong, confident and decisive pug... Tough and firm in his actions, but soft and sensitive in his words? In general, the image of a “real man” is somehow shapeless.

And if so, God bless him... Who is a "real woman"? And not long ago I heard a definition, during a conversation on the topic of "must/must", of this very woman. She must suit, or rather, correspond to her man. This thought somehow caught my attention. And indeed... The place is not named. Not behind, not in front, and not even to the side... Hmm. Correspond! And do you correspond to your "shapeless real man"? Are you ready to be different and flexible, solving men's problems when he is suddenly so caring and thrifty?

In general, all this is nonsense! As soon as the question “why” arose, the second hand began to move until the end of your relationship. He is real, she is real only when you answer the question “why” with a simple argument – because mine! But a complex structure will crack like ice when it has many components and connections.

Source